AB
A.K.A. BRANDS HOLDING CORP. (AKA)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue rose 10.1% year over year to $128.657M, beating S&P Global consensus of $122.374M; diluted EPS was -$0.78 versus -$0.80 consensus, a modest beat. Adjusted EBITDA was $2.665M, above Q1 guidance of $1.5–$2.0M . Revenue and EPS consensus values marked with *; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Gross margin expanded 100 bps to 57.2% on more full‑price selling and improved inventory; U.S. sales grew 14.2%, ANZ returned to growth (+6.2%), while Rest of World declined 19% .
- Management reaffirmed FY net sales ($600–$610M) but lowered FY adjusted EBITDA to $24.0–$27.5M (from $27.5–$29.5M); introduced Q2 2025 guidance: revenue $154–$158M, adjusted EBITDA $7–$8M, GM 57.2–57.4% .
- Stock reaction catalysts: revenue/EPS beat, gross margin expansion, and a detailed tariff mitigation plan (supply chain diversification and selective pricing), alongside strong U.S. momentum and omnichannel execution (Princess Polly SoHo opening, Nordstrom expansion) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- U.S. strength and multi‑channel expansion: “We grew net sales approximately 10% to $129M…with continued strength in the U.S. which grew 14%” and Princess Polly’s SoHo store was the strongest opening to date; early reads at Nordstrom were encouraging .
- Customer metrics and margin discipline: Active customers +7.8% TTM to 4.13M; gross margin +100 bps to 57.2% on more full‑price selling and improved inventory .
- Profitability above plan: Adjusted EBITDA of $2.665M (2.1% margin) exceeded expectations; management highlighted solid top-line growth and operating discipline .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP loss persisted and debt increased: Net loss of -$8.350M; total debt rose to $119.9M driven by U.S. store investments, with net debt higher year over year .
- Rest of World softness: ROW sales fell 19% YoY, offsetting some strength in U.S. and ANZ .
- Tariff uncertainty and FY EBITDA guide reduction: FY adjusted EBITDA range cut to $24.0–$27.5M due to heightened tariffs, despite mitigation actions (discounts, supply chain diversification, selective pricing) .
Financial Results
Headline metrics (YoY and sequential context)
Q1 2025 vs Estimates (S&P Global consensus)
Consensus values marked with *; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment (Region) breakdown
KPIs and operating metrics
Guidance Changes
Note: Q1 2025 was guided at revenue $121–$124M and adjusted EBITDA $1.5–$2.0M; actuals came in above both ranges .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “This marks our fourth consecutive quarter of growth…We grew net sales approximately 10% to $129 million, with continued strength in the U.S. which grew 14%” — Ciaran Long, CEO .
- “We anticipate our U.S. business will have minimal exposure to China in the fourth quarter…production already shifting to countries such as Vietnam and Turkey” — CEO prepared remarks .
- “Adjusted EBITDA…$2.7 million…showcasing the power of our model when we scale on the top line” — Kevin Grant, CFO .
- “Princess Polly opened its seventh store during the first quarter in Soho, which was our strongest opening to date” — press release .
- “We continued to deepen customer engagement…nearly 8% growth in our active customer base over the trailing twelve months” — press release .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs and margins: Management expects greatest tariff impact in Q2–Q3 before normalizing in Q4; mitigating via vendor discounts, supply diversification, and selective pricing; GM guide embeds these effects .
- China exposure: Predominantly out of China by Q4 for U.S. operations, while maintaining China relationships for ANZ to balance long‑term optionality .
- Demand trends and promotions: Solid Q2 demand; moderated vendor shipments and more selective promotions to manage tariff uncertainty .
- Selling expense leverage: Despite pre‑opening costs, underlying selling expenses leveraged in Q1 with further optimization expected; modeling mid‑26% for the year .
- Store/wholesale as acquisition channels: ~30% of store customers are new to the brand; wholesale expansion (Nordstrom, Dillard’s, Stitch Fix) broadening awareness .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 actuals versus consensus: Revenue $128.657M vs $122.374M consensus; diluted EPS -$0.78 vs -$0.80 consensus; both beats. Management’s prior Q1 guidance ($121–$124M revenue; $1.5–$2.0M adjusted EBITDA) was exceeded . Consensus values marked with *; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Forward estimates: Q2 2025 consensus revenue ~$155.821M*, EPS -$0.52*, alongside company guidance of revenue $154–$158M and adjusted EBITDA $7–$8M; FY 2025 consensus revenue ~$600.675M* and EPS -$2.397* vs company net sales $600–$610M and adjusted EBITDA $24.0–$27.5M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Implications: FY EBITDA guide reduction likely necessitates downward consensus adjustments for profitability, while top‑line consensus aligns with guidance; Q2 gross margin guide (57.2–57.4%) informs near‑term margin expectations .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The print was clean: revenue/EPS beats and 100 bps GM expansion signal pricing power and improved inventory quality; adjusted EBITDA outperformed Q1 guidance .
- U.S. growth engine intact (+14.2%); ANZ inflecting positive; ROW remains a drag—regional mix favors margin resilience .
- FY guide holds on revenue but EBITDA lowered due to tariffs; management’s concrete mitigation plan and supply chain diversification provide visibility into Q4 normalization .
- Omnichannel execution is accelerating (SoHo opening, Nordstrom chain‑wide), with stores and wholesale demonstrably driving customer acquisition and online halo effects .
- Watch Q2–Q3 tariff impact pacing, selling expense leverage (mid‑26% target), and gross margin range (57.2–57.4%) as near‑term KPIs .
- Balance sheet shows rising debt from store investments; monitor net debt and working capital as store rollout continues .
- Trading lens: near‑term stock reactions likely focus on revenue/EPS beat, margin expansion vs tariff headwinds, and confidence in Q2 guidance; medium‑term thesis hinges on U.S. TAM expansion via stores/wholesale and Culture Kings’ in‑house brand growth .